The People's Pigskin

July 31, 2010

Fantasy Preview Review – USA Today

Our look at the fantasy football magazines now dominating the sports section of your favorite newstand continues with one of the best-known titles in America.

USA Today 2010 Fantasy Football

Vital stats: $7.99, 144 pages, 354 offensive and 75 defensive players ranked.

Top 10 picks: If you’re in a 10-team league, USA Today’s experts (including recruits from at least a half-dozen other Web sites) say the first round of your draft should look like this: Chris Johnson, Adrian Peterson, Andre Johnson, Drew Brees, Steven Jackson, Larry Fitzgerald, Peyton Manning, Michael Turner, Maurice Jones-Drew and Ray Rice.

Intriguing nugget: Sigmund Bloom and Jason Wood of Footballguys.com are targeting Donald Brown as a steal, because he’s a second-year running back who didn’t live up to expectations last season. “Most people move on to the new flavors of the month at the position, but Ray Rice, Jamaal Charles, and Rashard Mendenhall were members of a lot of championship teams” last year.

Head scratcher: The section on quarterbacks starts with a list of the top 50 players available at that position. However, thanks to some fuzzy math, the section that follows that list has two quarterbacks ranked 42nd: Ryan Fitzpatrick (who appears on the list) and JaMarcus Russell (who does not).

I’m not sure which is a bigger head scratcher — the fact that there’s two quarterbacks ranked 42nd or the fact that someone thinks there are nine quarterbacks worse than Russell. That includes Colt McCoy, who also appears in the section with a rank of “NR.”

Kicker rule obeyed? Again, the USA Today experts did not conduct a mock draft. David Dorey of TheHuddle.com advises players not to draft a kicker until the very last round. “Anything earlier is as optimistic as e-mailing Jennifer Aniston and asking her out on a date.”

However, two pages after saying that, Dorey offers a system for those who want to carry two kickers on the roster: “You can make weekly decisions that can net you an extra three points. Just pick whichever kicker is more likely to be on a winning team that weekend.”

(If anyone here plays in a league where you can get an extra pick in the final round of your draft, feel free to leave a comment explaining how.)

Prediction likely to go wrong: That Vincent Jackson will be a top 10 fantasy wide receiver this season. Here’s USA Today’s assessment: “Jackson has even pushed ahead of TE Antonio Gates as a scoring threat. Jackson continues to upset the team with his immaturity, which could lead to a short suspension, but that’s the only thing going against him. Make him your No. 1 receiver.”

For the moment, let’s set aside the three-game suspension Jackson is facing for his second DUI guilty plea (probably not anyone’s definition of a “short suspension,” anyway). Unless he and the Chargers kiss and make up quickly, he could end up missing the majority of the season through a holdout. If that sounds like a No. 1 fantasy option to you, maybe you need to lay off the wine.

We’ll be back with the weekly NASCAR predictions.

14 Comments »

  1. Useful information like this one obviously is kept as well as maintained so I will put which one on my bookmark put! Thanks for this wonderful post and additionally hoping in post over of which!

    Comment by cheap jerseys — September 9, 2010 @ 8:54 am

  2. Hi, I can’t understand how to add your site in my rss reader. Can you Help me, please?

    Comment by Rm6s — September 10, 2010 @ 1:42 pm

  3. Thanks for this nice article. Assist in making my research a lot.

    Comment by Rm6s — September 10, 2010 @ 3:12 pm

  4. Maybe you should edit the page name title “Fantasy Preview Review — USA Today” to more generic for your blog post you write. I enjoyed the post nevertheless.

    Comment by Benac — October 29, 2010 @ 10:52 pm

  5. You certainly deserve a round of applause for your post and more specifically, your blog in general. Very high quality material.

    Comment by Alveo — October 31, 2010 @ 9:23 am

  6. I just sent this post to a bunch of my friends as I agree with most of what you’re saying here and the way you’ve presented it is awesome.

    Comment by Schreck — November 3, 2010 @ 4:16 pm

  7. Great Blog. I add this Blog to my bookmarks.

    Comment by Hartmann — November 9, 2010 @ 6:10 am

  8. I just book marked your blog on Digg and StumbleUpon.I enjoy reading your commentaries.

    Comment by Breiden — November 9, 2010 @ 5:26 pm

  9. I’ve been visiting your blog for a while now and I always find a gem in your new posts. Thanks for sharing.

    Comment by Konie — November 10, 2010 @ 7:33 am

  10. […] from a bad source? In this post, we look back at the predictions offered by four preseason fantasy preview magazines and consider whether they did any better than you would have fared picking your team this […]

    Pingback by Reviewing the Previews (Again) « The People's Pigskin — January 4, 2011 @ 11:26 am

  11. […] Fantasy Preview Review – USA Today July 20109 comments […]

    Pingback by 2010 in review « The People's Pigskin — January 4, 2011 @ 12:07 pm

  12. […] look back at the predictions offered by four preseason fantasy preview magazines and consider whether they did any […]

    Pingback by Reviewing the Previews (Again) « The People's Pigskin | FantasyHype: Fantasy Football — January 4, 2011 @ 11:00 pm

  13. This culminates in the timely coverage of insurance claims, bills,
    statements and make follow-up phone calls to the insurance carrier.

    In fact, used car buying guide is a major concern for them.
    Healthcare is one of the other benefit categories.
    The Department found that in some cases. Second, the payback time for a Used Car Buying Guide specialist, then this article is for you.

    Starting a new business in the nation and that will not change.

    Comment by used cars for sell — August 7, 2013 @ 4:16 pm

  14. It has long been lauded as a recession-proof sector and if
    the only reason you’re staying off a career in medical assistant training program. As per CPT guidelines, you shouldn’t select a
    CPT code that merely approximates the service provided to the
    patient and the provider.

    Comment by certified medical assistant — August 7, 2013 @ 7:05 pm


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.